In my last post, I talked about the the thematic connections between comedy and Buddhism and how comedy is a useful tool for attaining some of the goals of Buddhism. Another strong connection between the two is in the art form known as improvisation, or improv. In improv, groups of actors create characters, scenes, songs or other performance pieces on the spot without any specific preparation. Improv has several remarkable parallels to Buddhist practice.
"Play touches and stimulates vitality, awakening the whole person – mind, body, intelligence and creativity."
-Viola Spolin
Improv was first developed as a series of games and activities during the New Deal as a part of a larger Public Works project. It was originally envisioned as a tool which would help learners break down some of the barriers of adulthood and allow them to unlock their creativity through play. In the years since, it has become primarily associated with comedy. As a comedic art form, it was developed and flourished in Chicago at places like The Second City and iO.
“I became immersed in the cult of improvisation. I was like one of those athletes trying to get into the Olympics. It was all about blind focus. I was so sure that I was doing exactly what I'd been put on this earth to do, and I would have done anything to make it onto that stage.”
-Tina Fey
|
In Chicago and other cities with big comedy populations, there is a distinct improv community. As in Buddhism and other Eastern traditions, improv places a very strong emphasis on teacher student relationships. Much of a student's experience is dictated by the approach and quality of the instructors. While many improv teachers simply teach as an income supplement others are dedicated motivational figures. Some even become guru figures in the community and to scores of dedicated students. In the 1990's, I was lucky enough to study under the late great Marty DeMaat, a wonderful and gentle man who instilled a sense of ethical and responsible comedy in his students. I often like to think about improv as being like a martial art as it takes years to master and involves discipline and commitment. Unfortunately, they do not give out colored belts for attaining competencies in improv. But they should...
Like Zen Buddhism, improv presents a set of fundamental contradictions and paradoxes at the heart of its practice. In improv, we are expected to make something out of nothing. If it is being done correctly, there is no specific preplanning or preparation in pure improv. You simple go out and do it. Mind you, his is not the way that theater is normally done. Your average play will be rehearsed for several weeks before going up. Improv presents a very un-Western approach in that it is intuitive without excessive structure or control over the process.
Another paradox associated with improv and comedy in general is that you are expected to create comedy without "trying to be funny." Good improv instructors will always stress that their students are supposed to be honest on stage, they are supposed to support one another, and they are to remain in harmony but they are never to actively "try to be funny." Partially, this is because nothing is less funny than someone desperately trying to get a laugh out of you but mostly because if you are onstage focusing on getting a reaction from the audience, you are not present in the scene and supporting your partners. Trying to be funny is often the sign of a performer with a delicate ego that needs the approval of an audience and that's not fun for anybody.
Is what we're doing comedy? Probably not. Is it funny? Probably yes... What we do is too enchanting to be quantified.
-Del Close
In an improv performance, you are onstage performing in front of an audience (hopefully a big audience) literally putting yourself in a position where you will be judged with not preparation or script to fall back on with only your partners onstage to support you. Even for people who don't have a problem being in front of an audience, this can be terrifying. A lot of actors are scared to even try it. But as an improvisor, you are expected to keep a clear head in the middle of all that. If you are conscientious and well-trained, you are not thinking about all those eyes on you, or how to get a laugh from the audience, or what you will be doing after the show, or even what you will say or do next. You are simply out there doing it. If you are successful, you are not thinking about anything in particular and have achieved a kind of peaceful detachment in which you are almost a spectator. It's like a meditation paradox in which people are told to "clear their thoughts" or "don't think about anything" both ideas actually involve thinking. As with improv, once you have "solved" these paradoxes, you have mastered silmultaneously practicing the mindfulness and mindlessness that frees us from over-thinking.
Actors and improvisors are fond of the phrase, "being in your head." It describes a situation when you are onstage and thinking about everything else in your life, or obsessing over your own performance while you are giving it. This is perhaps improv's strongest parallel to Buddhism. In our every day lives, we are often so narrowly focused on ourselves that we are not paying attention to what is really going on around us. We are often so obsessed with the past and the future that we ignore the present. In this way, improv is like a creative meditation performed in front of an audience.

