REDUX Monster Movie of the Week: The Thing (1982)

Note this entry was originally published 8/18/09 and revised, expanded, and republished 8/28/26.

Director: John Carpenter
Genre: Horror/Suspense

THE MOVIE:

John Carpenter's The Thing is the story of a small group of men who are assigned to a remote American Antarctic outpost. Their isolation is interrupted by the arrival of a mysterious dog which is chased by a helicopter from a distant Norwegian settlement. Attempting to kill the dog, the helicopter and its pilot are destroyed. MacReady (Kurt Russell) and some others from the American base investigate the Norwegian settlement to find a gruesome mess. They also find what appears to be a flying saucer half buried in the ice and a mangled semi-human body.

When they return to the American station, the mysterious dog begins to mutate into some sort of Lovecraftian tentacle monster, attempting to absorb and mutate the other dogs in its pen but is torched by the crew before it can finish. From here we can very well have Alien On Ice, after all, this was produced immediately after the success of Ridley Scott's movie. No doubt, the success of Alien allowed The Thing to be made. 

However, the twist offered by Carpenter's movie is that this alien creature is able to assume the form of any other organism, so there is a compelling mystery element of never knowing which members of the crew are human and which have been infected by the monster. This fact alone helps underscore the tension and heighten the relationships between the characters. It's the rare movie of this genre that gives its actors something to do other than running around screaming. The cast is pretty stacked including the perennially elderly Wilford Brimley (Cocoon) and a young Keith David, who's face and voice are known from everything to Platoon to Rick and Morty.

The Thing was released at the tail end of the late '70's and early 80's sci-fi movie boom and was lost in the shuffle, actually being released the same month as Blade Runner and the massively popular E.T. Clearly, 1982 audiences were looking for a different kind of alien experience, and it was widely considered to be a box office flop. At the time of its release, it was criticized for its excessive gore and disgusting special effects. 

There was a time in which you either had to see a movie in the theater or on a television broadcast. Theatrical runs were much less front loaded than they are now, and movies would literally be in theaters for months and hit movies would even have re-releases. Popular movies had splashy TV premieres several years after their theatrical runs. If a movie had an unsuccessful theatrical run there weren't a lot of ways to recover the investment. That changed drastically with the advent of the home video rental market in the 1980's and also the rise of premium cable around the same time. Movies that didn't do well on first release could find a second life on home video. Movies that found their legs on the home video market include such classics as Blade Runner, The Terminator, and The Shawshank Redemption. The Thing is also a great example of a movie that was considered a flop upon release that people rediscovered in the subsequent years at home and the movie's reputation as a classic has only grown over time.

The movie has spawned a number of comic book sequels as well as a classic survival horror video game, and even a 2011 prequel movie, which confusingly shares the same title. Like Alien and Aliens,the influence of The Thing, can be felt in everything to the Halo and Resident Evil series of videos games to Tarantino's snowy ensemble thriller The Hateful Eight.

The Thing is actually a remake of a fifities sci-fi movie, The Thing From Another World, which in turn was loosely based on the novella "Who Goes There?" written in the '30's by John W. Campbell, which seems to have borrowed the Antarctic setting and themes from "At the Mountains of Madness" by H. P. Lovecraft. Carpenter's remake actually stays closer to the plot of the novella and restores the movie's idea that the creature can assume anyone's shape or identity. It also seems to have inspired the first season X-Files episode "Ice."

THE MONSTER/EFFECTS:

The Thing is a seriously gory movie but the effects are groundbreaking and imaginative and push the envelope of pre-digital effects. You don't really see creature effects this ambitious until T2 is released in 1991. I can even say that for a movie released in 1982 there are a few shots that DONT look dated today, which is pretty good for a movie that relies on stop-motion and animatronics.

The monster is only recognizable as a monster when it is in mid-transformation, when it is a mismatched collection of tentacles and bizarre flowery appendages, with human and animal parts randomly thrown in. Sadly, one never gets to see the alien's true form which would have been cool at the finale. Perhaps it doesn't have one.

MONSTERS FEATURED:

"The Thing" in various forms.

WHERE TO WATCH



There are various collector's editions which are loaded with extras and documentaries about the movie and its groundbreaking visual effects.

SEQUELS:

The 2011 prequels is set immediately before this and tells the story of the Norweigean station and an American scientist (Mary Elizabeth Winstead, in Ripley mode) brought in to examine the frozen creature. It was criticized for using CGI but using in-camera effects of the scale and ambition of the original movie was not.really a practical option in 2010 when this movie was made. I found it to be a fun companion piece to Carpenter's movie although not of the same level of quality.

SEE ALSO:

Alien (1979), The Fly (1986), The X-Files "Ice" 1993, The Thing (2011)

TRAILER:

If you are enjoying Monster Movie of the Week, check out my kaiju novel City of the Gods: The Return of Quetzalcoatl.

View on Amazon →

Patrick Garone

Chicago-based writer & director. Author of City of the Gods and We Lowly Gods.

🌳 Visit My Linktree

Redux Monster Movie of the Week: Gojira (1954)

Note this entry was originally published 10/3/2009 and revised and republished on 9/27/26.

GOJIRA* (1954)

Directed by: Ichiro Honda
Genre: Daikaiju eiga

THE MOVIE:

When you think of Showa Godzilla, chances are that you picture a big goofy looking rubber dinosaur grappling with a colorful and silly opponent. Unfortunately, most people’s conceptions of the King of the Monsters are rooted in the kid-friendly and badly-dubbed Technicolor movies of the late 60’s and early 70’s when the series had sunk irrevocably into camp. Because of this, most people are surprised by the tone of the original Japanese Gojira which is an urgent and somber meditation on the dangers of nuclear testing and scientific advancement. To a Japanese audience, only nine years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki this must have been powerful stuff.

However, not necessarily original stuff: Gojira was released only a year after The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms, an American movie which also featured a giant saurian creature woken by atomic testing which goes on a rampage through a major city but because of Japan’s legacy as the world’s sole atomic victim, there is an urgency and horror to the material in Japanese hands that’s not there in the American-produced Beast as though Gojira is the fevered nightmare of someone who experienced the aftermath of nuclear holocaust. This context is what makes Gojira more than just another radioactive monster movie and gives the film a richness and resonance that it wouldn’t otherwise have.





Another interesting element present in Gojira that is absent from the re-edited American version is a level of ambivalence about Japan’s relationship with America. It seems that the direct inspiration for the movie was a 1953 incident in which American nuclear weapons were tested in Japanese waters and the crew of a Japanese fishing boat became ill from radiation poisoning. This incident is actually directly referred to in the Japanese version of the movie but cut from the U.S. version to make it friendlier to American audiences. Thus, in the Japanese version of the movie, the blame for Godzilla is laid directly on America. There is a symbolic framework in place that makes Godzilla a symbol of U.S. (possibly and or Soviet) power in the world. In this sense, Gojira is a direct ideological ancestor of the 2006 South Korean film, The Host, another film that features a monstrous result of America’s policies in Asia. There is a long tradition of implicit or explicit US criticism in the series such as in Godzilla (1984), Shin Godzilla and Godzilla Minus Zero, this has sometimes resulted in those movies having America-friendly re-edits.

Another way to interpret the movie would be that Godzilla is visited on Japan as punishment for its aggression during the Second World War. Japan’s relationship with its wartime past is very complicated and they seem to feel simultaneously proud and guilty for their activities during World War II. In this interpretation Godzilla is a form of cinematic self-flagellation. This is explicitly the case in Godzilla Mothra King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack. In Gojira, he is literally created by American nuclear testing. But the monster doesn’t go to LA or San Francisco to punish the Americans, he goes straight to Tokyo and completely destroys the city, leaving it as though a bomb were dropped on it. He punishes the Japanese. Over the years in Japanese cinema, Tokyo and other cities are destroyed over and over again. Why do the Japanese seem to enjoy seeing their cities destroyed so much? I wonder how these movies play in neighboring Asian countries that were Japanese occupied during the war. How do the Chinese feel seeing giant monsters destroying Japan? I mean, we have our big explosions and disaster movies as well but it is not as much a fetish for American moviemakers to show this level of meticulous urban destruction. In Godzilla, the Japanese are simultaneously punishing themselves and revisiting their nuclear victimization which is why Godzilla is so potent as a monster and a symbol.

THE MONSTER/EFFECTS:

Gojira pioneered the use of “suitmation,” what Toho Studio calls the combination of rubber suit acting combined with detailed miniature sets. It has since been a staple of Toho’s Godzilla series and one they kept up well into the digital age, only recently abandoning it for their mainline movies in 2016 (it is still actively used for the short festival films they put out on a regular basis.)


MONSTERS FEATURED:

This, along with Godzilla, (1984) and the American Godzilla (1998), Shin Godzilla, Godzilla Minus One are the only films in the series to feature Godzilla without another monster opponent.

This "Shodai"Godzilla suit is really the template for the later Godzillas, which would later emphasize and de-emphasize different features. It established Godzilla as a chunky bipedal, (although tail-dragging) creature, with dorsal spines, dark, scarred skin, and atomic breath. This original version is little inconsistent in different shots where they were using a puppet but is notable for it's large eyes and mouth full of conical teeth including pronounced fangs which Godzilla has seldom had over the years. This one also gives him the stylized brows often featured in Asian folkloric art.

Since this is one of only two black and white Godzilla movies, there is some debate about what color this suit actually was. There were those connected with the movie who claim it was charcoal gray, which is the traditional Godzilla color. Others state that the suit was brown or even reddish. Most state that the suits mouth was painted bright red for contrast, which I am sure was hilarious.

MOST MEMORABLE SEQUENCE:

Godzilla’s chilling nocturnal rampage through Tokyo.

WHERE TO WATCH:

Although the American Godzilla: King of the Monsters has been available on DVD for years, the original Japanese version was unreleased in the U.S. until 2006 when the two disc set Gojira was released featuring both versions of the movie with some documentaries on Blu-ray.

As this writing it can be found on MAX (along with many of both the Legendary and Toto movies) and also on the Criterion streaming channel which is home to some of the more obscure entries of the series including Godzilla (1984), Godzilla vs Biollante  and the Rebirth of Mothra movies.

Streaming rights change quickly so if you love a movie your best bet is to buy physical media. 



SEQUELS:

There are currently about thirty-three movies in the Japanese Godzilla series. This one was immediately followed by:

Godzilla Raids Again (1955), King Kong Vs, Godzilla (1962) and Godzilla Vs. Mothra (1964.)


SEE ALSO:

The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms (1953) - A direct influence on Gojira  released the year before.
Godzilla Vs. King Ghidorah (1991) - Through an insane time-travel plot deals with the wartime origins of Godzilla and Japan's complicated feelings about the West.
Godzilla, Mothra, King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All Out Attack (2001) - Examines Godzilla's sometimes tortured relationship with Japan itself.
The Host (2006) - The US, making' monsters in Asia, Korea edition.

Shin Godzilla (2016) -A very on-the-ground response to Godzilla coming ashore movie. This one feels a bit like the original in that it is treated as an unprecedented event and taken very seriously. This Godzilla is more informed by the then-recent Fukushima radioactive accident.

Godzilla Minus One (2023): Recaptures both the urgency and the post-war time period of the original movie.

THE TRAILER:






TRIVIA:

Godzilla was originally to be realized as a stop-motion creature like the ’33 King Kong or the Rhedosaurus from The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms but Toho Studios lacked the budget and expertise to do this so they opted to go the rubber suit method. Can you imagine how cool a stop motion Godzilla would have been?

*In Japanese, “zee” actually sounds more like “dzjee” so “Gojira” actually becomes “Godzjeera” hence the anglicized Godzilla.

If you are enjoying Monster Movie of the Week, check out my kaiju novel City of the Gods: The Return of Quetzalcoatl.

View on Amazon →